Spring is springing in Sweden and I’m finally out from under my grant writing load. It is pretty easy to complain about writing grants and I am not innocent in this respect. But it is also an opportunity to explore new ideas and topics. This year I decided to try at the more applied government funding agency which I haven’t attempted before.
I generally do basic science. Sure some of my research might one day shed light on a practical problem but I’m in it trying to understand the world around me. So in previous years I haven’t felt my research fit with the more applied funding sources and didn’t want to jam a square peg into a round hole as it were. If I don’t see a real way that my research fits into a funding agencies goals then I didn’t see the point of sending something there. But this year was different because I started thinking about research questions that interested and excited me and were directly relevant to a more applied grant.
So here’s the steps that have lead me to thinking about a new field and exploring the possibility for grant funding. To begin, last year we bought our first house. I have always wanted to have my own garden and it is a true delight. We moved in mid-summer so we didn’t change so much last year but I was actively adding bee-friendly plants and pondering how to get rid of more grass. The former owners left us with a number of lovely flowerbeds that are starting their spring routine now but there is still an abundance of lawn. At the same time as I was contemplating increasing diversity in our backyard, I was also looking for a system to study here in Sweden. I want to work with nectar-rewarding flowers and was looking around for possibilities.
I started noticing fireweed popping up here and there in my travels. I knew the plant from living and working in North America (it is the study system of my master’s committee member, Brian Husband) and a fair amount is known about its nectar production. Perfect. But when I was looking and asking around for potential locations for populations, I wasn’t finding any local large populations. Instead I was seeing patches in and around the towns I live and work. This got me to thinking about the ecology of these urban dwellers. How does natural selection on floral traits work in an urban context? There are a number of flowering plants that thrive and reproduce in urban environments and this got me thinking about all the same kinds of questions I usually apply to ‘wild’ populations.
I causally started looking into the literature to see what was known about flowers and plant-pollinator interactions in urban landscapes. As I read, I discovered that there is a fair amount known about the ecology of these interactions (hence ‘urban ecology’ as a field of study) but much less is understood about how urbanization affects evolution. So I had fun exploring a new body of literature and saw a niche where my skill set could provide some answers.
I’m not sure that I’ll convince the funding agency to give me the money to do so but I have convinced myself that urban evolutionary ecology is a topic I’d like to explore further. I have some pilot projects planned for this year and I’ll see where they lead. I also have another grant application exploring the more basic questions of evolution of signals and reward in fireweed, so in some ways the funding gods will decide which way my research focus goes for the next few years. One of the outcomes for me is that I am more seriously thinking that applying for grants can be the motivation for thinking in new ways or on new topics. Maybe a little desperation (for funding, the next position, etc) can be a good thing and maybe for me I can find some of the answers in my own backyard. For now I’m happy that major grant writing can be set aside for a bit and I can enjoy the spring.
2 thoughts on “Backyard science”
Really like this idea. I always thought that plants common to front yards would be a cool evolutionary system to study, as they have been exposed to so many generations of mowing (or potentially pesticides). I notice a lot of plants flower when they are really small in front lawns (presumably to ‘duck’ under the lawnmower blade), and I wonder how much of that is genetic evolution vs. phenotypic plasticity? The other cool thing is many are worl-wide cosmopolitan weeds, so there is literally millions of parallel evolutionary experiments going on!
I know! The more I started thinking about this the more excited I got. There are a few cool studies starting to do this sort of urban evolutionary ecology. If you’re interested here’s one that I really liked on evolution towards selfing for flowers in urban landscapes http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1365-2435.2011.01923.x/abstract. I think there is so much interesting evolution going on here. Because fireweed is not likely to self within flowers due to the placement of stigma and anthers, I’m really curious what evolution might look like in this system. For example are they calling even louder to pollinators than their rural counterparts?
From a gardener’s perspective I like these papers that are thinking about directly assessing the benefits of different garden flowers to pollinators: http://aob.oxfordjournals.org/content/113/5/799.abstract and http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1365-2435.12178/abstract. As I get rid of grass it is nice to have some ideas as to what to increase the diversity with.